below jeffro found somewhere on internet,,
look at that stroker plates,,spark plug moved which I don't know why, relocate plug to top of the chamber maybe? probably trying to ignite at the top intake swirl ,,,carb intake moved for more straight intake tract,,make sense,,I have seen john harman engine with similar intake layout,,see top pic,,( i messed up picture layout,,,)
that top pic is from some ebay listing,, 120 ci shovel,,damn!!
below is interesting quote from alan sputhe about john harman engine,,i stole this from other site,,sorry,,
These were the biggest engines that could built at the time. Thay had 3 13/16" bores and 4 3/4" strokes. They pulled like crazy on the low end and would keep right on pulling until the rods snapped.
John was always of the opinion that bigger was better. Having reached the practical limit to bore size with the stock H-D heads and crakcase he built his own cone case with a higher deck and a much larger cylinder spiget and offset lifter blocks (exactly as Murch and S&S would later do.) The same with the heads. He basically made a larger version of the shovelhead with the intake and exhaust ports opposite each other. This way it was easy to mount two carbs and to make do with a single casting for both heads.
The problem with the Harman engine was that making it larger amplified all of the problems inherent in the shovelhead. It had an even larger hemispherical combustion chamber so the 4 1/4" pistons needed high domes which made them very heavy. The large surface area of the zero % silicon pistons soaked up a lot of heat so they had very poor thermal dimensional stability. When combined with the heavy cast iron cylinders (which were slow to heat up and slow to cool) it was impossible to maintain a reasonable piston to wall clearance. The heads used stock shovelhead rocker boxes. The short levers on the stock shovelhead rocker arms made it impossible to get enough lift to use the engines very large valves efficently.
A few more comments on the pistons. Some were made by ForgeTrue, some by Vinolia and some by Aries. All of them slapped like crazy when they were cold and stuck hard when they got hot. Most weighed over 900g each with pins and rings or almost double the weight of a stock EVO piston assembly. When combined with the heavy Corrillo rods that John specified the vibration was absolutely unbelievable. It was scary in fact; you just knew the engine was going to come apart any second. Since bearing loads increase at the square of RPM, the stress on the lower end was the ultimite limiting factor with these engines.
Regards, Alan Sputhe
I found this really interesting insight ( some stuff is well known factor on shovel),,I have huge respect for those two and whoever did that knuckle,,I admire people who challenges,,experiments,, these engines fucking rule!!
but those experiments and crazy engine require sacrifice,,or trade-off for its purpose..
i am learning everyday..